As global financial markets develop, sovereign debt management requires an increasing degree of expertise and professionalism. The World Bank and the IMF have encouraged the professionalization of such management, but never explicitly advocated greater autonomy for Debt Management Offices (DMOs) from political decision-makers. This is surprising because autonomy is an important element of debt management professionalism, and because it is a credibility mechanism. This paper explores whether these institutions may be indirectly promoting DMO autonomy since 2000.
With data from 75 democratic countries over the period 1950-2013, the paper gives us an overview of :-